United Railroads of San Francisco v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, C. J.
This is an application for a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondents from proceeding with the trial of a civil action which purports to be pending before the respondent court. There is no dispute as to the facts. The sole controversy herein relates to the legal conclusions incident thereto. A trial was had in the respondent court of the action of G-. L. Wilkinson, as Adm., etc., Plain tiff, v. United Railroads of San Francisco, a Corporation, Defendant, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant. Thereafter an order was made granting plaintiff’s motion for a new…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Hamblin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Walter v. Merced Academy Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Estudillo v. SEC. Loan & Tr. Co. of S. Cal.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Wilkinson v. United Railroads of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Kraft v. LamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Hackel v. Los Angeles RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- State Ex Rel. King v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1939
- Neal v. HaightOregon Supreme Court · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.