Legal Opinion

State v. Koppi

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 8, 2011No. A09-136PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRAS, Justice.

Appellant John Allen Koppi was convicted of second-degree refusal to submit to chemical testing (“test refusal”) under Minn.Stat. § 169A.20, subd. 2 (2010). Koppi first argues that the district court abused its discretion in giving the jury an erroneous instruction that articulated a purely subjective definition of probable cause. See 10A Minn. Dist. Judges Ass’n, Minnesota Practice — Jury Instruction Guides, Criminal, CRIMJIG 29.28 (5th ed. Supp.2009). Koppi also contends that the district court erred when it instructed the jury that the court had decided as a matter of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, IISupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. State of Minnesota v. Thomas Raymond StruzykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Dukowitz v. Hannon Security ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  5. State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API