State v. Koppi
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRAS, Justice.
Appellant John Allen Koppi was convicted of second-degree refusal to submit to chemical testing (“test refusal”) under Minn.Stat. § 169A.20, subd. 2 (2010). Koppi first argues that the district court abused its discretion in giving the jury an erroneous instruction that articulated a purely subjective definition of probable cause. See 10A Minn. Dist. Judges Ass’n, Minnesota Practice — Jury Instruction Guides, Criminal, CRIMJIG 29.28 (5th ed. Supp.2009). Koppi also contends that the district court erred when it instructed the jury that the court had decided as a matter of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, IISupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Thomas Raymond StruzykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Dukowitz v. Hannon Security ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.