Legal Opinion

Hibpshman v. Prudhoe Bay Supply, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1987No. S-1176PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

I. BACKGROUND.

Thomas Hibpshman was severely injured while employed on the North Slope. He thereafter instituted suit against Prudhoe Bay Supply, Inc., and Alaska Explosives, Ltd. [hereinafter collectively referred to as “Prudhoe Bay” ], for damages for personal injuries, alleging negligent breach of a duty to provide premises free from unreasonable defects and hazards. In this same complaint, his wife Rebecca Hibpshman asserted a claim for loss of spousal consortium.

The four minor children of Thomas and Rebecca subsequently asserted a claim against the same…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. De Angelis v. Lutheran Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Borer v. American Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1982

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Reagan v. VaughnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Mendillo v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1989

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API