Alvarado v. Thomson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THUMMA, Judge:
¶ 1 The core issue in this special action is whether the superior court properly found that intentionally creating and using a fraudulent acknowledgment of paternity, listing the wrong biological father to avoid the adoption process, constitutes a fraud upon the court. Because the fraudulent acknowledgment circumvented a best-interests assessment, the court properly found it was a fraud upon the court. The court also did not err in denying a motion to set aside its finding based on alleged misconduct that purportedly kept the birth mother from testifying at an evidentiary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Trantor v. FredriksonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Paternity of CherylMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Hays v. GamaArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Duckstein v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Department of Child Safety v. BeeneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hefner v. HefnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Engstrom v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Flores v. American Airlines IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Flores v. American Airlines IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Imh v. ManiatisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.