Department of Child Safety v. Beene
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THUMMA, Judge.
¶ 1 The issue in this special action is whether parents, at a trial (called an adjudication) on a motion to terminate their parental rights, have a due process right to call their children as witnesses to confront and cross-examine them about the children’s hearsay statements admitted in evidence. Petitioner Department of Child Safety (DCS) challenges the denial of its motion for a protective order seeking to preclude such testimony, arguing the superior court should have considered the children’s best interests in deciding whether parents had a right to call them as…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Alvarado v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- State ex rel. Montgomery v. PadillaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Dep't of Child Safety v. Stocking-TateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Brittany W., Ryan W. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Chongtanalertporn v. BrocatoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.