Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Engstrom v. McCarthy

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 9, 2018No. 1 CA-CV 16-0689 FCPublished

1Opinion of the Court

PORTLEY, Judge:

*655¶ 1 Dana Engstrom ("Mother") and James McCarthy ("Father") both challenge the parenting time and legal decision-making terms of the decree dissolving their marriage. Because we find their Arizona Rule of Family Law Procedure ("Rule") 69 agreement binding and no explanation in the record for any modification, we vacate the legal decision-making and parenting time orders and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 The parties married in 2002 and have four children. Mother filed a petition for dissolution of marriage in 2014.

¶ 3 After trial, the family court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kent K. v. Bobby M.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. Don ChappellArizona Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. PhillipsArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Nold v. NoldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. Loveland v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API