Legal Opinion

Imh v. Maniatis

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 8, 2021No. 1 CA-CV 19-0454Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE IMH SPECIAL ASSET NT 168 LLC, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. DAVID P. MANIATIS, Defendant/Appellant. ______________________________________ DAVID P. MANIATIS, Appellant, v. DANIEL WILLIAMS, Appellee. ______________________________________ IMH SPECIAL ASSET NT 168 LLC, et al., Real Parties in Interest/Appellees, ______________________________________ IMH SPECIAL ASSET NT 168 LLC, et…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Cockerham v. ZikratchArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Powell-Cerkoney v. TCR-Montana Ranch Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. Hurst v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API