Legal Opinion
Bahr v. Union Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 11, 1926No. 25,104PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Action upon the award of arbitrators in a fire loss covered by an insurance policy issued by. defendant. Findings were made in favor of a recovery thereon. The appeal is by defendant from the order denying its motion for a new trial.
It is not in dispute that a fire occurred in an apartment building occupied by plaintiff which damaged his household goods; that defendant had insured the same against loss from fire; that arbitrators wrere duly selected pursuant to the terms of the policy; and that an award of $800 for the loss was made and signed by two of the three arbitrators. The original…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McQuaid Market House Co. v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Turner v. FrybergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Hodge v. Franklin InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Kent v. CostinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Mann v. LambSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Khadouri Chaachou v. American Central Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Mork v. Eureka-Security Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Michigan Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. National Surety Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Sheffield v. CliffordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.