Walsh v. . Friedman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarksoN, J.
Tbe first exception and assignment of error made by defendants, respondents, we think must be sustained — which is as follows: “For that tbe Court found as a matter of law that tbe Will of William S. Walsb did not exercise tbe power given bim and Catherine Walsb took no interest in these lands by reason of said Will.”
Tbe pertinent parts of tbe codicil to tbe will of Margaret B. Walsb, after leaving a life estate to her daughter, Catherine Walsb, provides: “Now give and bequeath my said residuary estate unto my daughter Catherine, during her life, without security with power to sell or dispose…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Faison v. . MiddletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. MearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Gordon v. . EhringhausSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Burton v. . CahillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Cumston v. BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- First Union National Bank v. MossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Mitchell v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Schaeffer v. . HaseltineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Wachovia Bank and Trust Co. v. LivengoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.