Legal Opinion

Burton v. . Cahill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 10, 1926PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbogdeN, J.

Two propositions of law are presented by the record: 1. Do the life tenants under said deed, to wit, Annie L. Burton and Katie L. Cahill, take said land as joint tenants, for life, with right of survivorship, or as tenants in common?

2. Do the children of said life tenants take per capita or per stirpes?

The plaintiffs assert that the life tenants take as tenants in common, and that, at the death of the life tenants, the children of the life tenants would take per stirpes.

The defendants, upon the other hand, assert that the life tenants take as joint tenants and that, upon the death of the life…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rowland v. . RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Cullens v. . CullensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. McCallum v. . McCallumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Culp v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  5. Blair v. . OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. CoppedgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Gregg v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Holohan v. MelvilleWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Welch v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API