First Union National Bank v. Moss
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
This appeal raises the following issue: Did Helen R. Moss in her will, by devising the remainder of her estate “including any property or estate over which I have or may have any power of appointment,” effectively execute the power of appointment given to her by her husband, Cecil Paul Moss, in his will, which required that she “appoint and direct in an effective will or codicil specifically referring to the power of appointment”?
The cardinal rule in interpreting and construing a will, followed in countless North Carolina cases since Blount v. Johnston, 5 N.C. 36 (1804), is that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Laman v. McCordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Republic National Bank of Dallas v. FredericksTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cross v. CrossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- First National Bank of McMinn County v. WalkerTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
- Matter of Estate of SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
- Motes/Henes Trust v. MotesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Estate of EddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.