Legal Opinion

Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Mears

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 25, 1940PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Does the annexation, by codicil, of the power of sale or disposition, to the life estates given in the original will, convert them into fee simple estates? The trial court answered in the negative, and under the authorities to be cited, we agree.

In limine, it may be well to recall that the guiding star in the interpretation of wills, to which all rules must bend, unless contrary to some principle of law or public policy, is the intent of the testator, and this is to be ascertained from the language used by him, “taking it by its four corners,” and considering for the purpose the will and any…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. McIver v. . McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Chewning v. . MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Roane v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Williams v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Artis v. . ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Holland v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. House v. HouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Seawell v. SeawellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API