Legal Opinion
Malin v. Nuss
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 22, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1355PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Price, J.,
This appeal raises questions requiring interpretation of the Mechanics’ Lien Law of 1963, Act of August 24, 1963, P.L. 1175, No. 497 (49 P.S. §1101 et seq.). We reverse the Order of the lower court and remand for trial.
In 1965, the plaintiffs-appellants, Michael H. Malin and his wife, Dorothy S. Malin, contracted with Tad Home Builders, Inc., for the construction of a residence on property owned by the Malins in Hatfield Township, Montgomery County. The defendant-appellee, Robert W. Nuss, was engaged by Tad Home Builders, Inc., as a subcontractor. Pursuant to Section 401…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Artvale, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent v. Rugby Fabrics Corp. And Barmil Associates, Ltd., Defendants-Respondents-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Vogt v. Port Vue BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Cathcart v. CrumlishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- McCarthy v. ReeseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- John J. Heirigs Const. Co., Inc. v. ExideCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- Matternas v. StehmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Stringert & Bowers, Inc. v. On-Line System, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Beljan v. Bucks County Community College, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1979
- Matternas v. StehmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.