Legal Opinion

Vogt v. Port Vue Borough

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1952No. Appeal, 132PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

William O. Vogt and Charles A. Minnick, appellants, filed this hill in equity seeking to enjoin the Borough of Port Vue and Adolph Jacobyansky, individually and as burgess, appellees, from preventing appellants’ construction of a gasoline service station. Preliminary objections were filed by Jacobyansky averring, inter alia, that appellants had an adequate remedy at law by appeal pursuant to the provisions of the zoning ordinance. The court below concluded that the proper and exclusive remedy was by an appeal under the provisions of the zoning ordinance and The Borough…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Colteryahn Sanitary Dairy v. Milk Control CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Valicenti's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Ventresca v. ExleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. White v. Old York Road Country ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Knup v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Commonwealth v. FlynnCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Town of Berwyn Heights v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Board of Zoning Adjustment v. BoykinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co. v. ClairtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API