Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Reese

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1965No. Appeal, 49PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

This is an appeal from an order of the lower court dismissing plaintiff-claimant’s rule to show cause why *490the record satisfaction of his mechanic’s lien should not be expunged. The order must be reversed.

Claimant is a general contractor who contracted to construct a building for Dale and Margaret Reese, defendant-owners. In connection with this contract claimant executed a waiver of mechanics’ liens containing a warrant of attorney. The warrant, inter alia, empowers any attorney of any court of common pleas to appear for the claimant and mark satisfied of record,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hiestand v. KeathSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. Burger v. S. R. Moss Cigar Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Stoke & Co. v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  4. Dunham-Bush, Inc. v. Murray's 51 Lanes, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Pagnacco v. FaberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott's Development Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Sampson-Miller Associated Companies v. Landmark Realty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott's Development Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Malin v. NussSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. TCI Construction Corp. v. GangitanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API