McCarthy v. Reese
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Cohen,
This is an appeal from an order of the lower court dismissing plaintiff-claimant’s rule to show cause why *490the record satisfaction of his mechanic’s lien should not be expunged. The order must be reversed.
Claimant is a general contractor who contracted to construct a building for Dale and Margaret Reese, defendant-owners. In connection with this contract claimant executed a waiver of mechanics’ liens containing a warrant of attorney. The warrant, inter alia, empowers any attorney of any court of common pleas to appear for the claimant and mark satisfied of record,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hiestand v. KeathSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Burger v. S. R. Moss Cigar Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Stoke & Co. v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Dunham-Bush, Inc. v. Murray's 51 Lanes, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Pagnacco v. FaberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott's Development Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Sampson-Miller Associated Companies v. Landmark Realty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott's Development Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Malin v. NussSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- TCI Construction Corp. v. GangitanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.