Matternas v. Stehman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FORD ELLIOTT, Judge:
Appellants come before us challenging the entry of summary judgment in their action in assumpsit. The basis for the granting of appellee’s motion for summary judgment was that the matter complained of in appellants’ assumpsit action had already been decided by judicial determination and was thus barred by res judicata. We do not agree that res judicata applies instantly, nor do we believe that appellants are collaterally estopped from pursuing the issues raised by their lawsuit. Therefore, we shall vacate the order of the trial court and remand for a trial in this matter.
Ap…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- City of Pittsburgh v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Clark v. TroutmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- In Re Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Thompson v. Karastan Rug MillsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott's Development Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Dempsey v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Brown v. TucciDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- El-Gharbaoui, A. v. Ajayi, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Artsmith Development Group, Inc. v. UpdegraffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.