Stringert & Bowers, Inc. v. On-Line System, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Price, J.,
The issue in this case is whether an agreement by a subcontractor to waive a mechanics’ lien, obtained through the owner’s fraud, can validly be asserted to prevent the subcontractor from filing a lien claim. We hold that it cannot be so asserted.
The lower court disposed of this case by sustaining the defendants-appellees’ preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to plaintiff-appellant’s complaint. Thus, for purposes of this appeal, we must accept as true the facts averred in appellant’s complaint, and he must be accorded all the inferences reasonably deducible…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. FioravantiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Rose v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Toll v. BeckermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Malin v. NussSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Vansciver v. ChurchillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
3Cited by14 opinions
- National Building Leasing, Inc. v. BylerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- McIlhenny v. American Title InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Mar Ray, Inc. v. SchroederSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Ridgeview Construction Co. v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Mele Construction Co. v. Crown American Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.