Legal Opinion

Stringert & Bowers, Inc. v. On-Line System, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1975No. Appeal, No. 202PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Price, J.,

The issue in this case is whether an agreement by a subcontractor to waive a mechanics’ lien, obtained through the owner’s fraud, can validly be asserted to prevent the subcontractor from filing a lien claim. We hold that it cannot be so asserted.

The lower court disposed of this case by sustaining the defendants-appellees’ preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to plaintiff-appellant’s complaint. Thus, for purposes of this appeal, we must accept as true the facts averred in appellant’s complaint, and he must be accorded all the inferences reasonably deducible…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. FioravantiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Rose v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Toll v. BeckermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Malin v. NussSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Vansciver v. ChurchillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. National Building Leasing, Inc. v. BylerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. McIlhenny v. American Title InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Mar Ray, Inc. v. SchroederSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Ridgeview Construction Co. v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. Mele Construction Co. v. Crown American Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API