Legal Opinion

Niosi v. Empire Steam Laundry

California Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1897No. L. A. No. 225PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Lucien Shaw, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Appeals from the judgment and from the order denying the plaintiff a new trial.

Defendant Frank Staut was the driver of a wagon of the defendant Empire Steam Laundry. Plaintiff charged that he was injured by the negligence of the defendant laundry and its employee, Staut, under the following circumstances: About the hour of noon he was walking on the north sidewalk of Second street, in the city of Los *259Angeles, going east to his home. Mott alley, a public highway of the city of Los Angeles, extends from First street to and across Second street, and bisects the block upon which -plaintiff was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barker v. . SavageNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Burgesser v. Bullock'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Adler v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Wine v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Finkle v. TaitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API