Legal Opinion
Sheridan Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 13, 2010No. 10-547CPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
WHEELER, Judge.
In this bid protest, Plaintiff Sheridan Corporation (“Sheridan”) is challenging an agency’s corrective action that would involve the submittal of revised proposals where no apparent reason for such action exists. The United States Property and Fiscal Office of Maine, National Guard Bureau (“the agency”) awarded a contract to Sheridan on May 12, 2010 for the construction of a KC-135 aircraft hangar in Bangor, Maine. The agency made the award to Sheridan on the basis of initial proposals, without conducting any…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Pgba, LLC v. United States, and Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Caddell Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Palantir Usg, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Whr Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Fcn, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Rush Construction, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.