Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Veit v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 16, 1988No. C3-88-673PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

Appellant Louis Veit brought an action against respondents James R. Anderson and the Farm Company of Lyon County (Anderson) for legal malpractice and fraud. The trial court granted summary judgment for Anderson. We reverse, and remand the case.

FACTS

Louis Veit is a farmer in Lyon county. James Anderson is an attorney and a licensed real estate broker. Anderson operates his real estate business through a corporation, the Farm Company of Lyon County.

Anderson has done business with Veit both as an attorney and as a realtor. Anderson represented Veit on a medical malpractice…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Langeland v. Farmers State Bank of TrimontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Edward HOULIHAN; Agnes Houlihan, Appellees, v. OFFERMAN & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. Hanks v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  3. American Computer Trust Leasing v. Jack Farrell Implement Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
  4. Schwaiger v. Mitchell Radiology Associates, P.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Schuler v. MeschkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API