Legal Opinion
Schwaiger v. Mitchell Radiology Associates, P.C.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 7, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Jim Schwaiger (Schwaiger), a radiologist, sued Mitchell Radiology Associates, P.C. (MRA), for misrepresentations that allegedly occurred while MRA was recruiting Schwaiger as an employee. The trial judge granted MRA’s motion for summary judgment. Schwaiger appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶2.] This dispute stems from actions that took place prior to Schwaiger’s association with MRA. Dr. David Rundel (Run-del) and Dr. Carey Buhler (Buhler), both radiologists, formed MRA. Each owned an equal number of shares in the corporation and had equal ownership and voting rights. In 1994,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bradford v. VentoTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Edward HOULIHAN; Agnes Houlihan, Appellees, v. OFFERMAN & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Mash v. CutlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Slivinsky v. Watkins-Johnson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Stene v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- DRC Parts & Accessories, L.L.C. v. VM Motori, S.P.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- A-G-E Corp. v. State Ex Rel. State Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Poeppel v. LesterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Cleveland v. BDL Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Gades v. Meyer Modernizing Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.