Legal Opinion
SCOTT v. PETERS
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 25, 2016No. 114,913PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, J.:
¶ 1 We retained this cause to address the dispositive issue of whether notice imposed upon the grantor by the filing of a deed with the county clerk precludes this action as untimely. We hold it does.
FACTS
¶ 2 The plaintiff/appellant, Steven Boyd Scott (Scoti/grantor) owned real property in Canadian County, Oklahoma. 1 On August 11, 1997, Scott executed a warranty deed conveying 120 acres of the property to the defendants/appellees, Martin Peters, Jr. and Tammy Lynn Peters (the Peters/grantees). Scott alleges that he only conveyed his surface interest in the 120 of the acres of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Tong v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Woods v. Prestwick House, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- CALVERT v. SWINFORDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Harrison v. EavesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Kassner v. Alexander Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- CLAUDE C. ARNOLD NON-OPERATED ROYALTY INTEREST PROPERTIES v. CABOT OIL & GAS CORP.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- BASE v. DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.