Legal Opinion

Jones v. Alton & S. R.

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided April 30, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

This action was brought by plaintiffs under section 16, par. 2, of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 USC A § 16 (2), to recover alleged unreasonable excesses of freight rates charged by defendants for the transportation of coal from certain districts in Illinois to Marshall, Mexico, and Vandalia, Mo., in violation of section 1 of the aet (49 USC A § 1). The charges were made upon rates found by the Commission to be unreasonable in report No. 23424, Milton & Son et al. v. Alton & Southern Ry. Co. et al., 179 I. C. C. 200, decided November 23,1931, which covered in all…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Mitchell Coal & Coke Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Spiller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Williams v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Danville v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1940
  2. Midland Valley R. Co. v. Excelsior Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. Pitzer Transfer Corp. v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API