City of Danville v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL, District Judge.
By agreement these two cases, involving the same questions, were heard together without the intervention of a jury. They are suits brought under authority of Section 16 of what is known as the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 16, to recover damages based on orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission awarding reparation for freight charges on coal shipments which the Commission held were unreasonable. '
The petitioners in case No. 3698 filed complaint before the Interstate Commerce Commission in May, 1931, assailing as unreasonable rates on coal transported from…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- City of Cleveland, Ohio v. Federal Power Commission, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Speed v. Transamerica CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
- In Re Dow Corning Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Felder v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.