Legal Opinion
Pitzer Transfer Corp. v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 28, 1935No. 5450PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
The question of law presented at this time in the above case relates to the authority of the Interstate Commerce Commission to make a reparation award in favor of the plaintiffs against the defendants for alleged excessive rates collected on coal shipments from West Virginia and Virginia points to Roanoke, Virginia.
The amount awarded by the Commission to the Pitzer Transfer Corporation against the Norfolk & Western Railway was $1,320.77;' and against the Virginian Railway Company, $700.89. And to Rose-bro there was likewise awarded against the Norfolk & Western…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Danville v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1940
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- American Crystal Sugar Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1958