Legal Opinion

Williams v. Vreeland

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 2, 1919No. 318PublishedCited by 98 opinions

ERROR to the circuit court of appeals for the third CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

Williams, as receiver, sued defendant in error in the United States District Court for New Jersey to enforce an assessment against her levied by the Comptroller of the Currency (§ 5151, Rev. Stats.) because she apparently owned certain stock of the First National Bank when it failed, December 6,1913. She admits that the certificates were made out in her name and. at time of the failure were so entered on the bank books. But she claims that, without her knowledge or consent, her husband caused them to be thus issued and entered. And further, that although she signed blank powers of attorney…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Keyser v. HitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Owings v. HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  4. Matteson v. DentSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Empire State Cattle Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. BogashSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Catlett v. Chestnut, as Exr.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Duncan v. the Record Publishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  4. Oppenheimer v. Harriman National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Commissioner of Banks v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API