Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1948PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VViCKHiür, J.

Elijah Grattan Armstrong was the husband of plaintiff. The parties were married in 1930, and lived in Michigan until June, 1942, at which time they came (o Milwaukee where Armstrong obtained employment with F. G. Findley Company, producers of industrial adhesives. Within a few months he moved his family from Michigan to Milwaukee and worked at the Findley Company, learning the business. 1 le was thereafter given a job as traveling salesman in Michigan. His family continued to reside in Milwaukee for a year and four months while he traveled in Michigan for the Findley Company. On…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Goranson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. CBS, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hansen v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Lager v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Dibble v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API