Legal Opinion

State v. Hoffman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 31, 1972No. 93PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Justice.

Defendant brings forward four assignments of error. The first is to the court’s refusal to grant his motion for nonsuit made at the conclusion of the State’s evidence. The rule, succinctly stated by Justice Higgins in State v. Stephens, 244 N.C. 380, 383, 93 S.E. 2d 431, 433 (1956), is as follows:

“Taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, if the record here discloses substantial evidence of all material elements constituting the offense for which the accused was tried, then this court must affirm the trial court’s ruling on the motion. The rule for this and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API