Legal Opinion

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Finlay

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 19, 1939No. 3 Div. 270PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

On former appeal (Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Finlay, 233 Ala. 128, 170 So. 207), the record disclosed that the flood of 1929, which destroyed the car load of sugar here involved, was the highest known, and' attention was directed to that fact. The holding was that the loss was the proximate result of the “act of God,” and that plaintiff, upon whom rested the burden of proof under the decisions of the federal courts, by which this trial was to be guided, had not shown negligence on the part of the carrier, and that the defendant was due the affirmative charge.

Follow…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commissioners of Marion County v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Steele v. TownsendSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  3. Ford v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. LefanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Law v. Gulf States Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fairmont Creamery Co. v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Louisville N. R. Co. v. GrizzardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Central Aviation Company v. PerkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Hill Air of Gadsden, Inc. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. City of Birmingham v. CoeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API