Law v. Gulf States Steel Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
The action is to recover damages for alleged destruction of growing or ungathered crops by impounding or damming up the waters of Big Wills creek in times of heavy rains.
The motion to strike the bill of exceptions because it sets forth the entire testimony in narrative form is not well taken.
When instructions to the jury, whether in the oral charge, in given charges, or refusal of written charges, or rulings on evidence, are to be reviewed, whose correctness, materiality, or injurious effect can best be determined in the light of the entire testimony, it is proper to set it…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harris v. Town of Tarrant CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Ulbricht v. Eufaula Water Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Savage v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Sloss-S. S. & I. Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Gulf States Steel Co. v. LawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- FCC National Bank v. Gilmore (In Re Gilmore)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1998
- Kennedy v. Union Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- Bradford v. StanleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Garden City Co. v. BurdenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Custer v. Homeside Lending, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.