Legal Opinion

Hill Air of Gadsden, Inc. v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 29, 1988No. 87-172PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill Air of Gadsden, Inc. (hereinafter "Hill Air"), appeals from a judgment against it and in favor of Richard Marshall. Marshall sued Hill Air for damage to his Cessna 210 aircraft that occurred during a windstorm while the aircraft was moored at Hill Air's tie-down facility at the Gadsden Municipal Airport. The two theories Marshall included in his complaint were (1) breach of a bailment contract and (2) negligence.

Hill Air raised the affirmative defense of contributory negligence and further asserted that any and all damage to the aircraft was proximately caused by an act of God.

The case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pate v. Sunset Funeral HomeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. City of Jackson v. BrummettMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Shephard v. Graham Bell Aviation Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Central Aviation Company v. PerkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. Louisville N. R. Co. v. FinlaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United American Ins. Co. v. BrumleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Pacifico v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Alfa Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Bradford v. Universal Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Shadwrick v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API