Legal Opinion

Commissioners of Marion County v. Clark

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 22, 1877No. 653PublishedCited by 197 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of the United'States for the District of Kansas.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clifeord

Power is vested by law in the constituted authorities of counties and other municipal corporations to subscribe for and take stock in any railway company duly organized under the law of the State or Territory, or to loan the credit of the municipality to such a railroad company, subject-to the condition that the majority of the qualified voters of the same, voting at the election, shall, at a regular or a special election to be held therein, first assent to the proposal for such subscription; and the provision is that it shall be the duty of the municipal authorities, when the terms of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Goodman v. SimondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  4. Town of Coloma v. EavesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Parks v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1851

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by197 opinions

  1. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Galloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934

192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API