Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 1958No. Civ. 18322PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

Petitioner seeks both a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondent court from proceeding to trial after preliminary examination, and a writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to order the production and inspection of a certain statement made by the petitioner to police officers immediately after his arrest.

I. The Writ of Prohibition.

Petitioner was charged with a violation of Penal Code, section 447a (arson) and at the preliminary hearing was held to answer. Defendant was not represented by counsel at the preliminary examination. Petitioner moved the respondent court for an order…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Powell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Dowell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. NapthalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Jennings v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. ElliotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. JOE Z. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API