Legal Opinion

JOE Z. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1970No. L.A. 29806PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BURKE, J.

In this case we discuss the extent to which juveniles in delinquency proceedings are entitled to the benefit of pretrial discovery. We have concluded that the juvenile courts have the inherent and discretionary power to permit pretrial discovery upon a showing of good cause, that in the instant case the court exceeded its discretion in denying petitioner inspection of his own statements and admissions to the police and the recordings of his conversations with them, but that petitioner has failed to establish good cause for inspection of the statements, admissions and recorded…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. WeidertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. Gary W.California Supreme Court · 1971
  5. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API