People v. Napthaly
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing to set aside an information. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
The defendant was accused by information of the crime of assisting a prisoner to escape.
It is averred in the information that on the twenty-third day of February, 1892, at the city and county of San Francisco, one Adam Stroh, alias Johnson, had been arrested for vagrancy, and was then and there confined in the city prison of the city and county of San Francisco, and was then and there in the legal and lawful custody of the chief of police of said city and county, pending an examination upon said charge.
That on said twenty-third day of February, 1892, in said city and county,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Ex parte BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by58 opinions
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Jennings v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. ElliotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Wood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.