Dean v. Sedan Milling Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial. William H. Waste, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Plaintiff commenced the action to recover the principal and interest of a certain promissory note, executed by defendant, Sedan Milling Company, dated September 3, 1908, for $2,000, payable ninety days after date to the Central Bank or order, with interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum, payable' monthly. The Central Bank assigned the note to plaintiff, who brings the action. Defendant Postlethwaite indorsed the note as follows: “For value received, I hereby guarantee the payment of the within note at maturity or at any time thereafter with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Henehan v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Hughes v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Stroud v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Reynolds v. WardNew York Supreme Court · 1830
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Klein Norton Co. v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Wise v. ClapperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Hollywood Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Harvey v. DegarmoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Henry H. Cross Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.