Stroud v. Thomas
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action upon a promissory note executed by all the defendants. The defendant Mangrum answered separately, admitting the execution of the note, and alleging as his defense that he executed the same as a surety only and without other consideration; that he signed the same after it had been signed and delivered by the principal debtors; and that afterwards, and without his knowledge or consent, the plaintiff, for a valuable consideration, extended the time of payment of the note, and that thereby he was discharged. The court made its findings, and rendered judgment in favor of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frey v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- McNaught v. . McClaughryNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Halliday v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Schluter v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Jackson's Adm'r v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Fanning v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Bridge v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Popp v. Exchange BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Fowles v. National Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- State Ex Rel. McClure v. NorthropSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.