Legal Opinion

Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Hollywood Improvement Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 1941No. Civ. 2786PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

This action was filed June 28, 1938, for the foreclosure of a mortgage given by Hollywood Improvement Co., a corporation, to secure a promissory note dated May 1, 1929, in the sum of $25,000, payable on or before one year after date, and made payable to George L. and Pauline A. Eastman, who subsequently became endorsers of the note. The complaint sets forth fully the various endorsements and deliveries of the note and the various assignments of the mortgage through which means the note and mortgage came into the possession of the appellant which, at the time this action was instituted, was…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Newhall v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Concannon v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Moore v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Tolman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hahn v. HahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Krobitzsch v. MiddletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Louisville Title Insurance v. Surety Title & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. McRaeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Parrish v. GrecoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API