Legal Opinion
Harvey v. Degarmo
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 6, 1933No. Docket No. 999PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN ZANTE, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment rendered against them in the sum of $4,500 as damages for breach of certain contracts.
Plaintiff brought suit against defendants to recover damages for breach of contracts and for an accounting. The original complaint contained six causes of action, the first of which was based on a general contract, and the second, third, fourth and fifth on two specific written contracts, designated as order No. 458 and order No. 159, which were made pursuant to the general contract. The sixth cause of action was for an accounting.
At…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Cederberg v. RobisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Klein Norton Co. v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Main Street & Agricultural Park Railroad v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Thompson v. GornerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- D. L. Godbey & Sons Construction Co. v. DeaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Meier v. Paul X. Smith Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Thiele v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1999
- D. L. Godbey & Sons Construction Co. v. DeaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952