Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. MacCallum

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 23, 1996No. 96SA124PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs

This interlocutory appeal is brought, pursuant to section 16-12-102(2), 8A C.R.S. (1996 Supp.), and C.A.R. 4.1, by the District Attorney for the Twentieth Judicial District challenging various rulings of the trial court suppressing evidence in connection with a case alleging vehicular homicide while the defendant, Stephen Andrew MacCallum (MacCallum), was driving under the influence of alcohol, and other related offenses.

The trial court found that officers did not have probable cause to administer blood alcohol tests of MacCallum and therefore suppressed the test results. The court also…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. Leo Orlando MunizCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. People v. TrujilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. in the Interest of D.F.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. State v. RainsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  4. People v. WoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  5. People v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API