Legal Opinion
People v. Romero
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 26, 1998No. 97SA311PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs
In this interlocutory appeal under C.A.R. 4.1 and section 16-12-102(2), 6 C.R.S, (1997), the prosecution challenges an order of the Alamosa County District Court suppressing statements the defendant Mario Romero (Romero) made during custodial interrogation. The district court determined that police officers had delivered a proper advisement under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602,16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and had secured a written waiver of rights but improperly continued to question Romero after he requested the assistance of legal counsel within the meaning of Davis v. United…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Corsentino v. CordovaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- People v. ArroyaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- People v. MedinaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- People v. PittsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.