People v. Trujillo
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Quinn
In this interlocutory appeal, the People challenge a ruling of the district court suppressing a statement made by the defendant, Julian Arthur Trujillo, to a police officer during a stationhouse interview and also suppressing a shotgun and shotgun shells recovered by the officer during the interview. The district court ruled that the interview constituted custodial interrogation which should have been preceded by a proper advisement and waiver of Miranda rights 1 and that the shotgun and shells were the fruit of the illegal interrogation. We affirm the suppression ruling.
The defendant is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- People v. GenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- People v. BreidenbachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- People v. DraconSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. RivasSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.