Legal Opinion
People v. in the Interest of D.F.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 18, 1997No. 96SA217PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs
In this interlocutory appeal, brought pursuant to section 16-12-102(2), 8A C.R.S. (1996 Supp.), and C.A.R. 4.1, the prosecution seeks review of an order entered by the Juvenile Court of the City and County of Denver suppressing evidence of a concealed weapon found on the juvenile defendant, D.F. The juvenile court determined that reasonable suspicion did not exist at the time officers effected the investigatory stop. Based on the totality of the circumstances, we hold that the police officers did have a reasonable suspicion to stop the juvenile and seize the shotgun he was carrying.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Stone v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Turbyne v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Freedom Colorado Information, Inc. v. El Paso County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- People v. ValdezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Mendez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.