Legal Opinion

People v. Wood

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 30, 2006No. 05SA251PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTINEZ, Justice.

This case comes before the court on an interlocutory appeal from the trial court, pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1. The People challenge an order of the trial court suppressing statements made by the defendant on the day of his arrest. The trial court suppressed the statements for being involuntary and for violating the defendant’s rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). We find that the statements were made voluntarily but that many of the statements were obtained in violation of Miranda’s procedural safeguards. We affirm the order of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. People v. GenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. People v. BreidenbachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Effland v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  2. People v. GrantColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. MadridSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  4. People v. HankinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  5. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API