State v. Rannow
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
Appellant challenges the consecutive sentences imposed on five convictions of violation of a restraining order, arguing that the district court improperly departed from the sentencing guidelines without stating a reason for the departure. Appellant also argues that imposition of consecutive sentencing without a jury determination of the existence of aggravating factors violated the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). We reverse the sentence and remand for imposition of the presumptive…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. GouletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. KahapeaHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. AmundsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. HahnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. FranksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.