Legal Opinion

State v. Rannow

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 13, 2005No. A05-282PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge.

Appellant challenges the consecutive sentences imposed on five convictions of violation of a restraining order, arguing that the district court improperly departed from the sentencing guidelines without stating a reason for the departure. Appellant also argues that imposition of consecutive sentencing without a jury determination of the existence of aggravating factors violated the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). We reverse the sentence and remand for imposition of the presumptive…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. State v. GouletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. KahapeaHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. AmundsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  3. State v. HahnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  4. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  5. State v. FranksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API