Legal Opinion

State v. Hahn

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 31, 2011No. A10-780PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

On appeal from his conviction of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, appellant argues that (1) he was denied a speedy trial; (2) the district court committed reversible error by allowing the state to introduce sexually explicit images of the victim found on appellant’s computer; (3) the district court erred by ordering that appellant’s sentences be served consecutively; and (4) the victim’s testimony should have been excluded under the doctrine of judicial estoppel. We conclude that appellant was not denied a speedy trial and that the district court properly admitted…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. PieschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. BolteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  3. State of Minnesota v. Quentin Todd ChuteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  4. State of Minnesota v. Anthony Lee PrellwitzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  5. State of Minnesota v. Roxanne Kay DeFlorinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API