State v. Hahn
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
On appeal from his conviction of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, appellant argues that (1) he was denied a speedy trial; (2) the district court committed reversible error by allowing the state to introduce sexually explicit images of the victim found on appellant’s computer; (3) the district court erred by ordering that appellant’s sentences be served consecutively; and (4) the victim’s testimony should have been excluded under the doctrine of judicial estoppel. We conclude that appellant was not denied a speedy trial and that the district court properly admitted…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. PieschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. BolteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- State of Minnesota v. Quentin Todd ChuteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Anthony Lee PrellwitzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Roxanne Kay DeFlorinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.