Legal Opinion
State v. Rodriguez
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 11, 2007No. A06-974PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUEHLBERG, Judge. *
Appellant challenges the district court’s order sentencing him to a total of 338 months in prison, arguing that (1) the admission of hearsay evidence during a sentencing-jury proceeding violated his federal and state constitutional rights to confront witnesses against him; (2) the district court erred by failing to give an accomplice instruction to the jury; and (3) the district court erred by imposing consecutive sentences. Because we conclude that a criminal defendant does not have a federal or state constitutional right to confront witnesses against him in…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Box v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Nathan Alexander Jefferson v. Drew EvansCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Andrew William SerresCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. George Cornelius WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.