Legal Opinion

Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc. v. City of Irvine

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 2005No. G033763PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.

Introduction

Essex Property Trust, Inc. (Essex), applied for a conditional use permit to construct an apartment building in an industrial area of Irvine, California (the City). The City issued a negative environmental declaration and a conditional use permit. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc. (Royalty), filed a petition for writ of mandate challenging the City’s actions, alleging the City failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) when it issued the negative declaration and the conditional use permit without preparing an environmental impact report (EIR).…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Citizens for a Megaplex-Free Alameda v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Friends of Shingle Springs Interchange, Inc. v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Friends of Riverside's Hills v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Avenida San Juan Partnership v. City of San ClementeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. California Medical Ass'n v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API