Legal Opinion

People v. Wheeler

California Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1992No. S021961PublishedCited by 251 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of sale of cocaine. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352.) The Court of Appeal affirmed. We granted *288review to decide how Proposition 8’s “Truth-in-Evidence” amendment to the Constitution (Cal. Const., art. I, § 28, subd. (d) (hereafter section 28(d)) affects the statutory rule (Evid. Code, §§ 787, 788) that felony convictions are the only form of conduct evidence admissible to impeach the credibility of a witness.

We conclude that although section 28(d) abrogates the felony-convictions-only rule in criminal cases and gives criminal courts…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by251 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API