People v. Wheeler
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of sale of cocaine. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352.) The Court of Appeal affirmed. We granted *288review to decide how Proposition 8’s “Truth-in-Evidence” amendment to the Constitution (Cal. Const., art. I, § 28, subd. (d) (hereafter section 28(d)) affects the statutory rule (Evid. Code, §§ 787, 788) that felony convictions are the only form of conduct evidence admissible to impeach the credibility of a witness.
We conclude that although section 28(d) abrogates the felony-convictions-only rule in criminal cases and gives criminal courts…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by251 opinions
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.