Legal Opinion
Warner v. Conn (Kopp)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 11, 1943No. Appeal, 169PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,
This is an appeal from the order of the court below denying the owner of some printing machinery and equipment which passed into possession of the Receiver in Equity, virtute officii, the right to institute a sepa rate action against the Receiver to recover the proceeds of the sale of the machinery and equipment by the Receiver.
A Bill in Equity 1 was filed on December 2, 1942, in Court of Common. Pleas No. 1 of Philadelphia County for the appointment of a Receiver to liquidate and wind up the partnership affairs of Lawrence J. Conn and Thomas A. Warner,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Odell v. H. Batterman Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- Pearson Mfg. Co. v. Pittsburgh Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Durand & Co. v. Howard & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sovereign Bank v. SchwabCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Witt v. Commonwealth, Department of BankingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Blank & Gottschall Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Sovereign Bank v. SchwabCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Modart, Inc. v. Penrose Industries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.